Table of Contents

18 Impressions Statistics for eCommerce Stores

November 7, 2025

Data-driven insights revealing how digital ad impressions, viewability standards, and multi-channel strategies transform website traffic into measurable revenue

A 2014 Google study found 56% of display ads weren't viewable at the time; recent industry reports show average display viewability has improved to approximately 74%+—yet billions in advertising spend still face visibility challenges. While paid advertising generates initial awareness, the majority of eCommerce stores struggle to capture and convert the 70% of shoppers who abandon carts before purchase. OpenSend Connect addresses this critical gap by identifying high-intent visitors in real time and converting them before they leave, enabling stores to maximize every impression through multi-channel retargeting across email, social, and postal campaigns.

Key Takeaways

  • Viewability directly impacts revenue — The MRC/IAB standard defines viewable ads as ≥50% of pixels visible for ≥1 second; optimizing viewability improves campaign returns
  • Mobile dominates impression share77% of retail traffic occurs on mobile devices, demanding mobile-first optimization
  • Position drives exponential CTR differences — For organic results, position 1 achieves ~27-29% CTR versus 15-16% for position 2
  • Search outperforms display dramatically — eCommerce search ads generate 2.69% CTR compared to just 0.46% for display ads
  • Organic search dominates traffic sources — Organic search often represents the largest single traffic source, typically exceeding social and other channels significantly
  • Mobile apps convert significantly better — Mobile apps achieve higher conversion rates than mobile web experiences across most categories
  • Local intent drives offline conversion76% of smartphone local searches lead to business visits within 24 hours

Understanding Ad Impressions and Viewability Standards

1. The MRC/IAB viewability standard defines a viewable display ad as having at least 50% of its pixels in view for a minimum of 1 second (2 seconds for video)

The Media Rating Council and Interactive Advertising Bureau established strict viewability standards requiring 50% of display ad pixels to be in view for at least 1 second (2 seconds for video). This industry-wide threshold defines what counts as a "viewable impression," creating a baseline for advertisers who pay for impressions that actually reach potential customers.

2. A 2014 Google study found 56% of display ads weren't viewable; recent reports show viewability has improved to approximately 74%+

Early industry research revealed that 56% of digital ads were not viewable by actual people in 2014, leading to the adoption of current viewability standards. Since then, viewability has improved substantially, with recent Integral Ad Science reports showing average display viewability above 74% globally. However, visibility gaps from bot traffic, fraudulent inventory, and below-the-fold placements still contribute to wasted impression budgets.

3. Viewability improvements correlate with revenue increases

Industry data demonstrates that improving ad viewability generates measurable revenue growth. This direct correlation between viewability and revenue underscores why leading advertisers now demand highly viewable impressions for premium campaigns. The revenue impact justifies the higher CPMs associated with viewable inventory.

Mobile Commerce Impression Statistics

4. Mobile devices generate 77% of retail website traffic

Mobile has become the dominant traffic source for eCommerce, with 77% of retail visits occurring on mobile devices. This mobile dominance requires fundamental shifts in how impressions are optimized, delivered, and measured. Desktop-optimized campaigns fail to capture the majority of potential customers who now browse and purchase exclusively on mobile.

5. Mobile commerce continues explosive growth, projected to reach $2.51 trillion in 2025

Mobile shopping continues its explosive growth trajectory, projected to hit $2.51 trillion in 2025, representing a majority of total eCommerce sales. This massive market shift means mobile impressions increasingly determine overall campaign success. Advertisers must prioritize mobile-first creative, landing pages, and checkout experiences to capitalize on this trend.

6. Mobile conversion rates lag desktop by approximately 18%

Despite mobile's traffic dominance, mobile converts at 2.3% compared to desktop's 2.8%—an 18% gap. This conversion challenge means mobile impressions require superior optimization to achieve desktop-level returns. Speed, simplified forms, and intuitive navigation become critical for converting mobile traffic.

7. Mobile apps achieve higher conversion rates than mobile web

Mobile apps outperform mobile web experiences, delivering higher conversion rates across most product categories. This performance gap stems from faster load times, persistent login states, and native interface optimization. For eCommerce brands with apps, driving traffic to app environments multiplies impression value.

8. Mobile bounce rates increase 32% when load time exceeds 3 seconds

Page speed critically impacts mobile impression effectiveness. Google research shows that as page load time increases from 1 second to 3 seconds, the probability of bounce increases by 32%. Every fraction of a second matters—0.1-second improvements generate measurable conversion and average order value increases. Mobile impressions that lead to slow landing pages waste both ad spend and customer intent.

9. 76% of smartphone local searches lead to store visits within 24 hours, and 28% of those searches result in a purchase

Local intent searches demonstrate remarkable conversion power. Google research shows that 76% of people who search on smartphones for something nearby visit a business within a day, and 28% of those searches result in a purchase. This high-intent behavior creates immediate revenue opportunities for retailers combining local search visibility with location-targeted campaigns.

Search Ad Impression Performance Statistics

10. eCommerce search ads average 2.69% CTR

Industry benchmarks show eCommerce search advertising achieves 2.69% average CTR, establishing baseline performance expectations. This rate varies significantly by product category, keyword competitiveness, and ad quality. Search intent alignment proves critical, as bottom-funnel keywords typically generate higher CTRs than top-funnel awareness terms.

11. Google Shopping ads deliver 0.86% CTR

Product listing ads through Google Shopping achieve 0.86% average CTR, lower than text search ads but often at superior conversion rates due to visual product presentation. Shopping ads capture high-intent users who have progressed beyond information gathering to active product comparison. The visual format pre-qualifies clicks, leading to more purchase-ready traffic.

12. Featured snippets appear in roughly 10-15% of queries, with prevalence varying by query type and dataset

Featured snippet opportunities arise in roughly 10-15% of queries, with prevalence varying by query type and dataset. Featured snippets provide zero-click visibility that builds brand authority even without site visits. Optimizing content for snippet selection multiplies organic impression value.

13. 90.63% of web pages receive zero organic traffic from Google

The majority of published content—90.63%—generates no organic search traffic whatsoever. This statistic highlights the importance of strategic content creation targeting keywords with actual search volume and achievable rankings. Random content production wastes resources that could drive impression volume through targeted optimization.

Display and Programmatic Impression Statistics

14. Display ads achieve only 0.46% CTR for eCommerce

Display advertising performance lags significantly behind search, with eCommerce display ads generating just 0.46% CTR—an 84% decline from search ad engagement. This dramatic performance gap reflects the passive nature of display impressions shown to users not actively searching for products. Display serves awareness and remarketing functions rather than direct response.

15. Average CTR across industries is approximately 6-7% for search versus under 1% for display

The performance gap between search and display extends across industries, with search averaging significantly higher CTR than display. This substantial difference stems from intent alignment—search captures active demand while display attempts to create it. Successful campaigns combine search for immediate conversion with display for brand building and retargeting.

Cost and Efficiency Statistics

16. eCommerce has the lowest average CPC at $1.16

Cost per click in eCommerce proves remarkably efficient, averaging just $1.16—the lowest among all industries. This favorable cost structure enables profitable customer acquisition at scale for online retailers. The low CPC reflects product search intent and competitive auction dynamics within eCommerce categories.

17. Average cost per acquisition is $45.27 for eCommerce search ads

Converting clicks to customers requires average CPA of $45.27 in eCommerce search advertising. This benchmark helps retailers assess campaign profitability against customer lifetime value and average order size. Improving conversion rates and cart values reduces effective CPA while maintaining impression volume.

18. eCommerce search ads convert at 2.81% versus 0.59% for display

Conversion rate differences mirror CTR gaps between search and display, with search ads converting at 2.81% compared to display's 0.59%. This 376% performance advantage reinforces search advertising's direct response superiority. Display serves awareness and retargeting functions that complement search's conversion focus.

Converting Impressions Into Revenue

While impression volume creates opportunity, conversion determines profitability. The statistics reveal clear patterns: mobile dominates traffic but requires optimization to match desktop conversion rates; search impressions vastly outperform display; viewability improvements correlate with revenue growth; and owned audiences through email provide reliable visibility without ongoing impression costs.

eCommerce stores maximize impression value through comprehensive strategies that combine:

  • High-intent search campaigns targeting bottom-funnel keywords with strong commercial intent
  • Mobile-first experiences optimized for the 77% of traffic occurring on mobile devices
  • Email audiences that avoid many of display advertising's viewability challenges
  • Cross-device identity resolution to unify fragmented customer journeys
  • Multi-channel retargeting across email, social, and postal to re-engage the 70% who abandon carts

OpenSend Connect addresses the fundamental impression challenge by identifying anonymous visitors in real time and converting them before they leave. Stores build owned first-party audiences that generate impressions through email campaigns that complement paid advertising.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a good click-through rate for eCommerce ads?

Click-through rates vary dramatically by channel and placement. Search ads should target 2.69% CTR or higher, while display ads typically achieve 0.46% CTR. For organic results, position 1 placements can reach approximately 27-29% CTR, while Google Shopping ads average 0.86%. Industry, product type, and keyword competitiveness significantly impact achievable rates.

How does mobile traffic affect eCommerce impression value?

Mobile now generates 77% of retail traffic and will drive substantial sales in 2025, making mobile optimization essential for impression value. However, mobile converts at 2.3% versus desktop's 2.8%, requiring superior mobile experiences to capture this massive traffic source effectively. Mobile apps convert better than mobile web.

Why are digital ad impressions sometimes not viewable?

A 2014 study found many digital ads weren't viewable due to bot traffic, fraudulent inventory, below-the-fold placements, and rapid page abandonment. While viewability has improved to approximately 74%+, challenges remain. Current MRC standards require only 50% of pixels visible for 1-2 seconds. Email avoids many of these viewability issues, though delivery doesn't guarantee a view—open rates are affected by image blocking and Apple Mail Privacy Protection.

How can eCommerce stores maximize impression value?

Stores maximize impressions through multi-channel strategies combining high-intent search advertising, mobile optimization, email audiences, and identity resolution. Capturing visitor emails through tools like OpenSend Connect creates owned audiences for retargeting, complementing paid impressions. Focus on the 10-15% of queries with featured snippet opportunities and position 1 rankings that achieve optimal CTR.

What impression metrics matter most for eCommerce profitability?

Viewability, position, device type, and conversion rate determine impression profitability more than volume alone. Optimizing viewability delivers revenue growth, while securing position 1 versus position 2 improves CTR substantially. Mobile impressions require special attention given 77% traffic share but lower conversion rates. Track cost per acquisition (average $45.27) against customer lifetime value to ensure sustainable profitability.

Get The Ultimate Guide to Identity Resolution

Discover how first-party identity resolution can transform anonymous site visitors into actionable revenue, without relying on third-party cookies.
Download Now

7B+

Event Daily

In our network, we see the traffic for 100k+ US-based sites

180M

US Shoppers in Network

We have a 73% USA shoppers match rate

100%

Legally Compliant

We follow all the laws and regulations to always comply

End-to-end encryption

and consent-based partnerships
"Opensend has helped us grow our sales month over month ever since we started using their platform. The best part is that it's very easy to integrate with your Shopify and Klavyio account!"
Josh Colley
Co Founder, Track Barn

Ready to see your best customer?

Target smarter. Spend better. Glow faster.
Get Your Personas

Get 1 month free for $1

Exclusive, blog only offer: Identify hidden visitors and boost conversions for only a dollar.
Start Your Trial

November 7, 2025

Before iOS 14: The rollout of ITP

Apple’s attempts to protect privacy and limit 3rd-party tracking scripts started way before iOS 14 was released in September 2020. 
In 2017, Apple began tightening cross-site tracking via the debut of Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP)—blocking 3rd-party cookies, shortening lifetimes for some 1st-party cookies, and generally sanding down “free” identifiers marketers had taken for granted.
If you felt your cookie windows shrinking in 2019, that was ITP 2.1 capping many JavaScript-set cookies to 7 days.

iOS 14: The mobile ID reset

With the release of iOS 14 in September 2020, App Tracking Transparency (ATT) made device-level ad identifiers opt-in, and Apple shipped privacy-preserving attribution options (e.g., Private Click Measurement on web/app-to-web).
In response, Google added WBRAID/GBRAID tracking parameters to keep some campaign measurement working in iOS flows where gclid was no longer viable.
Much more notably, seeing the writing on the wall for 3rd-party tracking pixels, Facebook released its Conversions API (CAPI) in 2020 to help advertisers track campaign engagement without complete dependence on Facebook Pixels.
References:

iOS 17: The link parameter squeeze & further limiting of cookie lifespans

With the release of iOS 17 in September 2023, Link Tracking Protection (LTP) started stripping known tracking parameters (think gclid, fbclid, msclkid) in Mail, Messages, and Safari Private Browsing.
UTM parameters typically continued to pass for aggregate reporting, but click-ID-only pipelines got shakier in these contexts.
References:
Perhaps more importantly, with the release of iOS 17, all Safari WebKit browsers (including desktop browsers) started deleting all tracking cookies set with 3rd-party JavaScript after 7 days of inactivity on a website.
References:

iOS 26/Safari 26: “Default-on” tightening

Now, in the fall of 2025, we are of course confronted by further tightening of 3rd-party tracking pixels with these default changes to click IDs.

Stay ahead of the curve

Ecom advice delivered to your inbox
We’re buyer’s choice on TrustRadius.